[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] imbrike



 I also oppose a fu'ivla, and think drutapla is fine.  I'd be more concerned with its material (t3) than "direction of overlap" any day (we could always fi'o that if it were important to talk about, but in my fifty years of life, I have never once heard anyone mention the direction of shingles/tiles.  And I've had roofwork done on my house several times).

             --gejyspa

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Sebastian <so.cool.ogi@gmail.com> wrote:
The disposition became a little bit wrong, so therefore I send this mail again.

.ienai
I don't understand the need for a fu'ivla for such a non-specific word.
When I now look up the words tile/shingle/scale used in the proposed definition for {imbrike}, these words seem to have different meanings, and therefore produce a rather vague pe'i brivla.
So if the intention is to have a word for the more general concept "roof covering", I suggest the lujvo {drugadri}: g1 is a roof covering for covering/sheltering roof d1=g2.

{rudyta'o} suggested by la remod seems to be (too?) specific, since not all roof coverings are made of boards.

Another type of roof covering is for example "roofing tile" (the intended word?), {drustaku}: s1 is a quantity of/contains/made of flooring tile(s) made by s2, of composition s3, in form/shape s4, for use on roof d1.

But if the intention is to use the very specific meaning "a very specific shingle", it would be useful to have a fu'ivla. But why a stage-4. Do we really have to fill the jbovlaste with odd looking stage-4 fu'ivla (unless they seem especially useful like {iklki} and {fi'ikca}).
I wouldn't know what the hell {embrice} is if someone use this word in a conversation, but with {stakrembrice} I would at least have a clue.
I know that some lojbanists seem to dislike, and therefore avoid stage-3.
But in my opinion I think stage-3 should be standard. The reason for this is that they add a subject category to the word (by which you for example could distinguish words like {cmacrnintegrale} and {dinjnintegrale}, CLL 4.7, or the difference between the plant, the spice, the seed or some other part of a particular genus). 
Additionally, I do like the phonetic variation of different kind of words in lojban, from the simple klama to the crunchy sound of the consonant cluster in stage-3. Also I think stage-4 should almost ONLY be introduced "where a fu'ivla has become so common or so important that it must be made as short as possible" (CLL 4.7).

By the way, there have been a lot of discussions of glossary on the mailing list, but these discussions far from always result in words added in jbovlaste. Why?

mu'omi'e jongausib

Skickat från min iPhone

18 feb 2013 kl. 11:48 skrev Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:

The "èmbrice" is a very specific shingle, the common Italian word is "tègola" (with letters pronounced as in lojban) from the latin "tègula" from "tègere"=to cover.

In Italian the sound for that 'c' is t͡ʃ  (/tS/ in X-SAMPA) rather than k (/k/). Same goes for Latin since in Italy the Latin words are pronounced according to the ecclesiastic Latin rather than the classical Latin.

I would go with the fu'ivla {embritce} (rembembering that the stress is on the {ibu} ) only for that very specific type of shingle and would resort to a lujvo (probably {rudyta'o} with gloss "x1=t1 is a shingle/tile covering the roof of x2=r2 made of x3=t2") for the generic concept.

mi'e mu'o la .remod.



On Monday, February 18, 2013, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I'm thinking of "imbrike" for "roof tile, shingle, or scale" (x1 is a
tile/shingle/scale covering x2, ovelapping in direction x3). Is this concept
useful enough in composition that it could have been made a gismu, had anyone
thought of it back then? Should it be "imbrike" or "imbrice"? Or "embrice"
(which is how it's spelled in modern Italian)?

Pierre
--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.