[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] "we" and masses. A bug in the CLL?

I thought I just did. 

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 20, 2013, at 0:47, la arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:



On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19:41 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
Oops!  I probably should have said {na'i} (false dichotomy) since "we" is actually neither.  It is, however, contextual, "the salient group of the speaker and associate(s)", exactly {lo za'u cusku}, I I think.


Do you think you can give a precise definition of {zo'oi we} in Lojban?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.