Re: [lojban] scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites

[Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>]

On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:58:14 Michael Turniansky wrote:
>      Maybe in Palestinian Aramaic of NT times(?  But I don't know. what's
> your source?)  But not in Talmudic Aramaic.  It's still -u-.  See for
> example, Kiddushin, 66a ( http://images.e-daf.com/DafImg.asp?ID=2758&size=3
> ) in the middle column, middle of the line that's one line below where it
> says "Mai" in big letters on the left column.

zoi zoi. prucim .zoi xebro sordaivla .ije lo drata valsi bene'i le vlali'i cu 
xebro .iku'i lo drata vlali'i cu vasru lo .armaio valsi

I have the Aramaic English New Testament, which is the 1905 Peshitta cross-
edited with the Khabouris Codex; footnotes indicate where the texts differ. 
It's in square script, but the nequdot look like they were transliterated from 
Syriac script. There are no schwas, and /o/ and /u/ are written as qamats waw 
and qubuts waw instead of cholam and shuruq.

> > mi tatpi lo nu zukti so'ida .i le ckana bene'i le bu'uzda cu denpa tu'a mi
> 
> xu do  skudji zo zukte

go'i .i mi pu tatpi

mu'omi'e .pier.
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.