Re: [lojban] official status of dotside?

[Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>]

I think it isn't official, but I would hardly agree to tag such things as disputed.

Firstly, the extra dot is valid Official Lojban, so there is really no argument in this particular case. Secondly, marking every deviation from the official language "disputed" will lead to a proliferation of such tags in the Lojban Tatoeba corpus, and that is a terrible promotion of the language. I think it is better to just add a new translation under the convention you prefer, and possibly comment it.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

On 22 February 2014 02:50, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

This arose in comments to a tatoeba sentence. I was pointed that {.ken.} doesn't need a front dot, i explained that it's dotside and i was suggested to somehow tag such *disputed* sentences.

How can we know that dotside is not disputed? Has it ever been given official sttus?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.