On 13/04/2014 20:26, Jorge Llambías
wrote:
Mmh this looks like an use of {vajni}. I'd have expected [This book] to be a sumti raising (jai...).
In your previous example, you used an object as vamji-2, and now you're using an event. I still don't understand the nature and role of vamji's arguments and how they relate to each other. This gismu seems to be bloated; I don't see why 4 core arguments are necessary. Perhaps the relation between vamji-1 and vamji-2 is similar to that between dukse-2 and dukse-1 (respectively)? Otherwise I don't see what vamji-1 is all about. The corpus usage of vamji-1 seems somewhat inconsistent: • https://www.alexburka.com/~danr/#?stats_reduce=word&cqp=[tags%20_%3D%20%22vamji1%22]&search_tab=1&within=sentence&hpp=100&search=cqp I wonder how you would have defined vamji's argument structure if you had never seen vamji's definition as it stands in the gimste. mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |