Hmm, I definitely don't understand this response very well. It sounds like you're
saying that the baseline is complete yet undocumented. Reminding us that the
language is intended to be "frozen" until the documentation is indeed
complete. Furthermore, that you don't believe the BPFK will ever be "finished"
completing that documentation. You then state that lojban is a non-static
evolving language.
So if I at least read you correctly, I'm unsure how to interpret the content.
Are you suggesting that BPFK will never complete the documentation of the
baseline (and hence reach an unfreeze) *because* lojban is ever changing? (If
not, why do you believe the BPFK will never finish - we agree that its unlikely
but if lojban's dynamic nature is not the reason, I'm interested as to why you
think so)
What is the overall aim of your reply? If you indeed believe that lojban is an
evolving language then I don't actually see the source of fervor. Maybe you are
just emphasizing the supposed machinations of policy that are supposed to address
the goals that we're trying to accomplish by nominating selpa'i to this position?
Maybe you are emphasizing the supposed freeze and trying to encourage us to not
endeavor to change it until this happens, especially by nominating someone with
the specific purpose of having the right to do so?
Maybe I've missed you completely. Which I definitely don't want because I'd like
to address your actual concern.