On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
punji2 or punji3 being a property?With the "property as a portable possession" metaphor, punji2 could be a property of punji3.That's the metaphor we've been talking about for all those gismu where that the gismu list makes the "pedantically"comment.With the "property as a location" metaphor, used for example in denpa3done. denpa3 =property of x1I notice that you have left only properties in most of the possession places, but I think that's wrong.
The property-as-possession metaphor should be the secondary meaning, not the main one.
The main meaning should be for the concrete possession.
And the same should apply to the property-as-location metaphor. "dunda lo plise" is the basic sense, "dunda lo ka ponse lo plise" is a derived abstraction. "denpa fi lo panka" is the basic sense, "denpa fi lo ka zvati lo panka" is a derived abstraction.