On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 05:40:37AM -0700, TR NS wrote:
> According the preceding explanation of poi the first sumti of the
> subordinate clause if filled by the reference if ke'a is not given. That
> would be tu.
No, the first ba'e unspecified sumti of the sub-clause is assumed to be {ke'a}.
Attachment:
pgp3ClFyaF4gv.pgp
Description: PGP signature