Re: [lojban] CLL Corrections

[TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>]

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 8:49:48 AM UTC-4, v4hn wrote:

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 05:40:37AM -0700, TR NS wrote:
> According the preceding explanation of poi the first sumti of the
> subordinate clause if filled by the reference if ke'a is not given. That
> would be tu.

No, the first ba'e unspecified sumti of the sub-clause is assumed to be {ke'a}.

"Like any sumti, "ke'a" can be omitted. The usual presumption in that case is that it then falls into the x1 place:" Example 1.7 on page 170.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.