On Thursday, August 7, 2014 8:49:48 AM UTC-4, v4hn wrote:On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 05:40:37AM -0700, TR NS wrote:
> According the preceding explanation of poi the first sumti of the
> subordinate clause if filled by the reference if ke'a is not given. That
> would be tu.
No, the first ba'e unspecified sumti of the sub-clause is assumed to be {ke'a}."Like any sumti, "ke'a" can be omitted. The usual presumption in that case is that it then falls into the x1 place:" Example 1.7 on page 170.