Re: [lojban] Tenseless predicates mean -able?

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

Loglan has many crazy things of which the lack of {ko} immediately copmes to mind but here is what you should subscribe to and ask there.

https://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/loglanists/
Also try reading NB3.

2014-09-26 17:26 GMT+04:00 TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>:

On Friday, September 26, 2014 9:05:20 AM UTC-4, la gleki wrote:

To explicitly express "-able" use {ka'e} adverb.

i la alis ka'e se ctuca = Alice is possible to be taught.

i la alis ka'e ba mo'u cilre = It is possible that Alice will learn [something].

i la alis cu tadni = Alice is/was/will be a student.

That's what I expected. So Lojban (if not Loglan itself) dropped this whole notion of capability. That's interesting b/c if you read this section JCB seems quite adamant about it, as if it were the whole point of not specifying tense.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.