* Sunday, 2014-11-09 at 12:38 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> > * Sunday, 2014-11-09 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> > > > * Saturday, 2014-11-08 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > ca ro nu mi xagji kei ko'a fasnu
> > > > > > > ,i ko'a nu ge ko'e fasnu gi ko'i fasnu
> > > > > > > ;i ko'i nu ko'o balvi ko'e
> > > > > > > .i ko'e nu mi klama lo zarci
> > > > > > > .i ko'o nu mi klama lo zdani
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand. Could you explain in this example at what times
> > > > {ko'o balvi ko'e} would hold?
> > >
> > > The claim is that it holds each time I'm hungry.
> >
> > I mean, can you explain it in terms of ko'o and ko'e.
>
> I'm not sure what kind of explanation you mean. I examine each of the times
> I'm hungry, I examine where ko'o is with respect to ko'e on each of those
> occasions, and I determine that ko'o is after ko'e in all of them.
But if ko'e and ko'o are fixed, how can this change from time to time?
What role does current time play in determining the truth value of {ko'o
balvi ko'e}?