On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:2017-11-21 22:25 GMT+03:00 Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:Just note that PEG doesn't "resolve" parsing ambiguity in a common sense of this verb.Not sure what you mean here, Gleki.Given a PEG there can be only one parse tree for a string and this is what matters most.Yes, and it does NOT resolve ambiguity.Sorry Glecki but I still don't understand which ambiguity you are referring to, can you make an example?
People instead of doing work themselves like to authorize SomeoneElse to do it.I agree and that's why I never stepped into this area (even if I'm guilty myself to have written a PEG parser for my own use :) )--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/e94H-wdh5gc/ .unsubscribe
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .