Mail Thread Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- la mark,l fraba'u fi la mark,
Mark L. Vines
- lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu,
Mark L. Vines
- Attemptive?,
Mark L. Vines
- On and around "let",
Paulo Barreto
- <Possible follow-ups>
- On and around "let",
Paulo Barreto
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
Don Wiggins
- Re: On and around "let",
Don Wiggins
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
Paulo Barreto
- Re: On and around "let",
Paulo Barreto
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
Chris Bogart
- Re: On and around "let",
Chris Bogart
- Re: On and around "let",
ucleaar
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
jorge
- Re: On and around "let",
ucleaar
- Re: CONLANG: Babel Text in Basic Anglo-Saxon English,
Jeffrey Henning
- Poetic?,
Mark L. Vines
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Poetic?,
Mark L. Vines
- Poetry,
Don Wiggins
- Hello there everyone, I just got this address and have just began to,
EDWARDMD
- katna,
Goran Topic
- loj,
Goran Topic
- <Possible follow-ups>
- loj,
Goran Topic
- Third person imperative,
Don Wiggins
- "ko" considered bad,
Don Wiggins
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "ko" considered bad,
Don Wiggins
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Logical Language Group
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Logical Language Group
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Don Wiggins
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Don Wiggins
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
jorge
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Logical Language Group
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
jorge
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Logical Language Group
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
ucleaar
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
ucleaar
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Paulo Barreto
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Paulo Barreto
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
ucleaar
- Re: "ko" considered bad,
ucleaar
- purple lojban,
Logical Language Group
Mail converted by MHonArc