Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/10 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/10 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 2010/10/10 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> A: .i ie pei xamgu
>> >> B: nai .i na xamgu
>> >
>> > Okay, two questions.
>> >
>> > 1) What does nai by itself even mean? and
>>
>> It's the answer to the "pei" question.
>
> Ah. I see. I would've answered {.ienai}.

You can't be serious! That would mean you agree with me and contradict
everything you have been saying.

With your rules you should have to answer ".i .ienai".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Yes, fine, whatever. Obviously I would've begun my speech, as always, with {.i}. I was saying I would nat have answered {.iepei} with {nai}, but with {.ienai}.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.