Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's fine by me, but the actual cmavo itself was never named, and trying
> to find what that cmavo is based on it's definition is an extremely
> difficult task.

I looked for it, but I couldn't find it. It may well be that it never
received an actual form, i.e. we may only have discussed the
possibility of creating such a cmavo. It was years ago, and searching
the list archives is no easy task unless you know exactly what words
were used.

In any case, I don't think it can be made to work at the formal
grammar level. The choice of what the whole text to parse is will
still remain a meta-choice, even if there is a cmavo that helps
whoever makes the choice in making that choice.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.