Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/9 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> If it's an existing selma'o, then either UI or BAhE are the best
>> >> choices, I think. Even they will fail if the first speaker ends with ZO or
>> >> ZEI though, because you wouldn't be able to complete with what you really
>> >> want to complete. You would need to use some additional trick with SI.
[...]
> I thought the working of the "continue jufra" cmavo was that it would be
> removed from the result, so that

I was talking about the case where they were in UI or BAhE. It
wouldn't belong to any selma'o if it is going to be stripped away
before parsing.


> A: la'e di'u smuni zo
> B: di'ai blablabla
>
> becomes
>
> la'edi'u smuni zo blablabla
>
> If di'ai deletes itself, the problem would be keeping it from doing so, not
> what you're describing.

I suppose the problem still exists for B if they want to repent of it
once they uttered it, since "di'ai" would be invisible to "si". Or
maybe "di'ai si" can also be part of the pre-parsing process.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.