[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can't think of any way to say this succintly, so please excuse any
> rambling. What I'm trying to get at is, unless the new speaker begins with
> {.i}, or by extension {ni'o} and related, the new speaker is to be taken as
> continuing the previous speaker's sentence. If, however, the new speaker
> does begin with {.i} or related, then /regardless/ of what the previous
> speaker said, it is a new sentence.
That would entail a huge change in the grammar. In fact I'm not sure
it's even doable, you are essentially giving a different grammar to I
and NIhO when they are the first word in a new voice than when they
are not the first word in a new voice.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.