On Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Jorge Llambías wrote:
--On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu> wrote:Oh, that comment was on a different page. I agree, {sa} probably shouldn't be in those see-also lists at all as it's not really related to BAhE. Consider my proposals amended to remove LEhU from the definition of {bu} and remove {sa} from the see-also lists of {ba'e} and {za'e}.That too, but I meant this comment in the definition of ba'e: "The two words are considered distinct for "sa" matching purposes".mu'o mi'e xorxes
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.