[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla



And Rosta, On 26/10/2014 08:48:
Jorge Llambías, On 25/10/2014 21:34:
Actually, that's not quite true. We do need to identify valid onsets
in order to determine words, but this discussion wasn't really about
onsets.

The question about onsets being whether CGV is a valid onset?

But "morphological onsets" are needed too, aren't they. E.g.
/patrAma/ is two words /pa trAma/ whereas /partAma/ is one word,
because of the rules for morpho-onsets.

Sorry, I see now that in another message you had indeed said (in effect) that word segmentation depends primarily on morpho-onsets, i.e. permissible word-initial /#C%C/ sequences.

If morpho-codas were unconstrained, and morpho-onsets were as per CLL (modulo any semivowel complications), what effects would that have on current lexis and usage?

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.