[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla



On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:43 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

If morpho-codas were unconstrained, and morpho-onsets were as per CLL (modulo any semivowel complications), what effects would that have on current lexis and usage?

I don't think it would invalidate anything, it would just open the door to more ugly fu'ivla. The restriction on codas is based solely on aesthetics and analogy. Lujvo never have codas heavier than a single consonant, and it seems like a good thing to maintain that restriction for fu'ivla, which are supposed to be as close as possible to core lojban words without interfering with their decomposability.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.