Thanks, durka! I'm willing to proceed in whichever direction BPFK indicates, i.e. marking the non-conforming words as obsolete, or applying changes to the words so that they conform. re: gleki's suggestion, once the changes have been applied for v135 (or v112951 per LMW), I'd be glad to consider a similar revision to the list of words marked obsolete by previous changes to the morphological rules.
On Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 9:18:17 AM UTC-8, la durka wrote:
This spreadsheet shows the words invalidated by the CGV rule and two possible ways to automatically fix them: replacing {xua} with {xuua} (CVGV) or with {xu'a} (CV'V), discounting words where that doesn't help (because the result is a tosmabru or a lujvo, for example). I am not saying we should apply a blanket fix without looking through the words, but it's useful to have this list to look at.