Re: [bpfk] Re: official cmavo form

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

mukti scripsit:

> Thanks, durka! I'm willing to proceed in whichever direction BPFK 
> indicates, i.e. marking the non-conforming words as obsolete, or applying 
> changes to the words so that they conform. re: gleki's suggestion, once the 
> changes have been applied for v135 (or v112951 per LMW), I'd be glad to 
> consider a similar revision to the list of words marked obsolete by 
> previous changes to the morphological rules. 

I would be in favor of breaking up the CGV into CV'V uniformly.  THe
only downside is that this will shift stress where the CGV is final,
but I can live with that.

"You vill give me d'inSTRUment!"  --English with an Esperanto accent

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
When I'm stuck in something boring where reading would be impossible or
rude, I often set up math problems for myself and solve them as a way
to pass the time.      --John Jenkins

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.