Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Jorge Llambías scripsit:

> Yep. An intermediate possibility would be to keep the rafsi system,
> but discard the slinku'i exception. That would make the rules for
> brivla recognition much simpler, so that for example slinku'i and sporte
> would be valid fu'uvla, at the cost of requiring "y" in some more CVC-
> initial lujvo.

That's exactly what Loglan has done.  Lujvo suffer a little, fu'ivla
benefit a little.  For that matter, we could take an even simpler approach
and just say that CVCy- is always required initially in words of three
or more syllables.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
If a traveler were informed that such a man [as Lord John Russell] was
leader of the House of Commons, he may well begin to comprehend how the
Egyptians worshiped an insect.  --Benjamin Disraeli

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.