[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: out of control
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: out of control
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:40:10 -0300
- Delivery-date: Fri, 07 May 2010 10:41:17 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DT6mPHrgRnsW5Rm3E9FJ0tZpves6J8pfOwbFNudJVQY=; b=T6yWH6vcxRRr5nP6HXphtKXbmZtLijO1nouockS/H4wa36xJ79wotR35L5TfLTVc31 eROqaGqQwgfLkraDzApTYAXVe32DC4aaEwZUuXw+VcwN38ezDNrSBsHNwnlCrHUYD4RB wYFGPjsDxt0hIYFGjwd3JJq7iHhL/19cUg2eE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rveBzi4FF68Sm/eybjIKzG/sYrXStmRZscuz7ac4epYkUeXuaD93eJvvDR3WSOlPyo Jq/5D5wbE9WrPGr9kwSgQU5nevlzWHWbnSDVPofhdUK7fqks4+e/glA/rKLipktkqKSC aBnGN+W803jCRt9yU9HQUHmaSGT8Jaaf4BW0Q=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <20100507173217.GE29740@nvg.org>
- References: <p2o5715b9301005070915re6cfa24dj20d546f18b00f2df@mail.gmail.com> <20100507173217.GE29740@nvg.org>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:15:06PM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
>
>> Because of left grouping this implied to me that
>
> I can only guess that someone started with {se'itro}, and just tacked on a tol- to invert it without thinking about it much, since that the usual way of doing that with gismu.
Is there any official or jvajvo rule that dictates left grouping of
rafsi for lujvo? My understanding was that grouping in lujvo was
normally left unspecified.
mu'o mi'e xorxes