[jbovlaste] Re: out of control

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

I've always understood lujvo to be basically like fu'ivla that have been created from rafsi.  That is, that they don't HAVE to adhere to the exact place structures/left-right-grouping/etc...  But I've always thought that it was a good idea to make a lujvo be as close to the tanru from which it comes as is pragmatically possible.

It's not a big deal, I was just wondering why it was of this form.

2010/5/7 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:15:06PM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
>

>>  Because of left grouping this implied to me that
>

> I can only guess that someone started with {se'itro}, and just tacked on a tol- to invert it without thinking about it much, since that the usual way of doing that with gismu.

Is there any official or jvajvo rule that dictates left grouping of
rafsi for lujvo? My understanding was that grouping in lujvo was
normally left unspecified.

mu'o mi'e xorxes