[lojban-beginners] Re: broda moi

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

2009/6/4 Jorge LlambÃas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Michael Turniansky
> <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:02 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>I suppose "da me lo broda moi" or "lo me lo broda moi cu brode" is
>>>>valid.

>
> I think you have seen it before, although perhaps only with pronouns,
> "me mi moi", "me do moi". I'm quite sure I have used it in things you
> have read.

  Yes, now that you mention it, I have seen you use this.

>
>
>>ÂIs this
>> construct in the CLL? ÂIf so, where?)
>
> Ch 18. Sect 11:
>


 Thanks for the pointer.

>
> The use of "me (sumti) moi" to mean "x1 is (sumti)'s" is not mentioned
> in CLL however, it is a latter innovation.

  Do  you find any particular need/aesthetic value in using this
construct rather than a NOI or GOI (or in the case of selbri use,
ponse, srana, ckini, steci and the like)?  It seems like a very odd
thing to me to take something with no "numerosity" associated with it,
and combine it with a cardinality aspect.

                   --gejyspa