[lojban-beginners] Re: Dictionary output

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Saturday 27 June 2009 09:38:09 Johan Pretorius wrote:
> I appear to have found an ambiguity:
> >       Word: {*dei*}
> >       Type: cmavo
> > Gloss Word: {this utterance}
>
>       Word: {djedi}
>
> >       Type: gismu
> > Gloss Word: {full day}
> >      rafsi: dje *dei*
>
> Am I right in surmising that the rules of morphology will be such that a
> rafsi can never be confused for a cmavo?

Yes. The rules have some corner cases, such as "deiskrima", which is a fu'ivla 
because "skrima" is a slinku'i, but there "dei" is not a rafsi 
because "deiskrima" is not a lujvo.

Pierre