Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Possession with "le le ..."

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:37 PM, .alyn.post.
<alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> While this is valid:
>
>  lu lu broda cu brode
>
> with terminators it is:
>
>  lu lu broda li'u li'u cu brode

Actually, it's "lu lu broda vau li'u cu brode vau li'u"


What CU does is separate the selbri of a bridi from the leading terms
of that bridi. CU cannot be used in front of a selbri that has no
leading terms.

The grammar of CU is extremely simple:

   sentence <- (terms CU?)? bridi-tail

That is the ONLY context in which it can be used. No sentence, no CU.
(In "zo cu", "cu bu", and other magic word stuf it is not really being
used as such.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.