> > .i ti cukta fi la .alex lo jbobau cilre
>
> Pointing at non-phisical existences is illegal; at least xorxe taught me
> that...
Hmm... If I did, I probably didn't put it that way. Pointing at something
non-physical would seem to be impossible rather than illegal. {ti} is
_supposed_ to refer to things you can point at, but sometimes
people don't use it that way.
Alright.
As a separate issue, {cukta} seems to be more often than not used
for book the physical object rather than book the literary work.
But there he pointed to the reader itself which at most appears on Your
screen and isn't a phisical object.
> I always think of {lai loglandias. kontrapozitivos.} to clarify the
> situation for myself.
> (Notice there are no {la loglandias. kontrapozitivos.}.)
What is that?
It is the xanri ke jmaboi kelci'e bende of Loglandia. :)
mi'e darves.