Re: [lojban] la za'e filjvocedra (The Age of Easy Lujvo)

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/5 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, basically that's what I did.  Took a long-arse tanru and smooshed it
> into a lujvo.

What was your long-arse tanru? How did "no" fit in there?

> My question is, xorxes, if you saw {mi nelci lo nu nunynonbaupo'evlafi'i}
> would you get what I was saying?

I don't know, try me next time we are talking in Lojban. I would
certainly not get it at first sight, and probably not without some
relevant context.

>  Tanru
> are useful, they don't all have to be broken down into explicit bridi.

Why not just stick with tanru then?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Um, because lujvo are shorter?

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.