[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: preti lei cfila

To: Iain Alexander <ia@stryx.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: preti lei cfila
From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:12:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <199506100053.UAA00896@locke.ccil.org> from "jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU" at Jun 9, 95 08:54:18 pm
Reply-to: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>

la .and. joi la .xorxes. cusku be di'e casnu

> > > vao le nu le tui la blokbustr. vidni cu jarco ku se cfila?
> > >           le pe tu'i...
> > Why is the {pe} needed? Can't BAIs be preposed?
>
> No they can't. Another of those that should be made legal if the
> parser can handle it.

Unfortunately, this garden-paths the parser.  After "le BAI" it expects
a selbri.

--
John Cowan                                              cowan@ccil.org
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

Prev by Date: Re: replies mainly on masses
Next by Date: Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers
Previous by thread: Re: preti lei cfila
Next by thread: Re: example of si'o?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread