Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: non-existance predications, (continued)
  • Re: non-existance predications, Logical Language Group
  • Re: non-existance predications, jorge
  • Re: non-existance predications, jorge
  • Re: non-existance predications, Logical Language Group
• fuzzy logic, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • fuzzy logic, John E. Clifford
  • fuzzy logic, John E. Clifford
  • fuzzy logic, BestATN
• lates changes - response to And, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lates changes - response to And, ucleaar
• inner quantifiers and clauses - cimei again, Logical Language Group
• misc responses to Goran - dleayed as usual, Logical Language Group
• properties of masses, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • properties of masses, John E. Clifford
  • properties of masses, John E. Clifford
  • Re: properties of masses, jorge
  • Re: properties of masses, jorge
  • Re: properties of masses, jorge
  • properties of masses, John E. Clifford
  • Re: properties of masses, Logical Language Group
• meet women of the former USSR through romance ads, Olga . Kosmina
• loi stedu be lo'e remna (was Re: quantifiers on sumti), Dylan P. Thurston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: loi stedu be lo'e remna (was Re: quantifiers on sumti), jorge
• concise filling of places, Dylan Thurston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: concise filling of places, Chris Bogart
• lei re gutci, Logical Language Group
• lo vs. le - the in mind distinction, Logical Language Group
• And's morphology proposal, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: And's morphology proposal, ucleaar
• sorry to burst on you-all like this, Logical Language Group
• older usage of Loglan - reply to Dylan, Logical Language Group
• masses, quantifiers, and ko'a, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: masses, quantifiers, and ko'a, jorge
• clamber, Logical Language Group
• lo'e, Logical Language Group
• "adjective" in the gismu list, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "adjective" in the gismu list, Dylan P. Thurston
• more gismu comments from Jorge, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: more gismu comments from Jorge, jorge
• Re: imperative mood, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • imperative mood, Logical Language Group
  • Re: imperative mood, Logical Language Group
  • Re: imperative mood, jorge
  • Re: imperative mood, Chris Bogart
• Re: ni/jei abstractions, fuzzy logic - response to many postings, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ni/jei abstractions, fuzzy logic - response to many postings, Logical Language Group
• Re: pa remna, quantifiers, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • pa remna, quantifiers, Logical Language Group
  • Re: pa remna, quantifiers, jorge
• preti lei cfila, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: preti lei cfila, jorge
  • Re: preti lei cfila, jorge
  • Re: preti lei cfila, ucleaar
  • Re: preti lei cfila, John Cowan
• Re: example of si'o?, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • example of si'o?, Logical Language Group
• cnino cifnu, Logical Language Group
• Re: myopic singular, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • myopic singular, Logical Language Group
• Imperative..., Cyril Slobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Imperative..., jorge
  • Re: Imperative..., Logical Language Group
• ship of Theseus and sevzi, Logical Language Group
• gaits, Logical Language Group
• birds?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: birds?, ucleaar
• plipe, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • plipe, Logical Language Group
  • plipe, Logical Language Group
• plipe (& time usage), Dylan P. Thurston
• Lojban a natural language?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lojban a natural language?, jorge
  • Re: Lojban a natural language?, ucleaar
• there isn't any ANY problem, ucleaar
• Purpose of the gismu list, Logical Language Group
• Another question about imperatives, Robert Weiss
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, jorge
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, jorge
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, John Cowan
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, jorge
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Another question about imperatives, John Cowan
• techish replies mainly to Lojbab, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: techish replies mainly to Lojbab, jorge
• Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, jorge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, ucleaar
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, ucleaar
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, jorge
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, ucleaar
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, jorge
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, ucleaar
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, jorge
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, ucleaar
  • Re: bits & pieces to Jorge on quantifiers, jorge
• mass again, Cyril Slobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: mass again, jorge