[lojban] Re: Original orthography draft now online for critique

[Florian Larysch <florolf@devbraindump.de>]

I actually liked the grouping of the sounds as it was in rev1 (although slightly 
incorrect, I could have lived with l/r), but rev2 is also fine.
Still, I'd prefer keeping the flick as a voicing marker.
X-archive-position: 14336
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: florolf@devbraindump.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

(continuing to type after some discussion on #lojban)
I've put together a custom version of the characters I like the most: 
http://florolf.devbraindump.de/fud/lojbo/lerfu.jpg although replacing the r by a 
flicked l would further decrease the number of different glyphs.

Although I haven't tried it yet in a larger text, breaking characters is a) 
harder to write (although that might just be me..) and b) makes the text look 
(as Lakmir then put it) caffeinated. .u'i
After all, backtracking or just stopping after a flicked character isn't hard 
enough to justify sacrificing one of the script's main attributes: Beauty.

mu'omi'e florolf


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.