[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:28:23 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=SyGjcb1g8scw0ravTjCNoJfs9zHa7ibOe7iPCy7+vbk=; b=VvIHFXXuJX2yZmAjmmpChU/WqBd514oxBjlpN2og92A1nLd72FVFEcyF+twKeNAYzz BDJcMGpUIG9i2FHXQ/T9TnZ0kImLdEmFSn7f3Akp3ljanP7Z9pUOakF6D7ZK8mEIPBtx 4cGce/2SscMQS8is/2aB7+9ZPetbYrqdo9VK0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HxaNE/GZVdHCrz0/kCFv3i0XRmZXJAm6pdhn+hA8s7BrU7v8IZPpQZtdtW5ANQbUY7 +T8C8OSMKHKCq3GumG3PMoqm2l4Ni0owHTdnaTX36q5ekIvDjLd9+IQT94FkEaVRF9zH 8m3rBsQf3DxzB6T3dac/fJFUGhRcZcjDjWHpo=
In-reply-to: <737b61f30811071636j27778025n697e4fffe031f433@mail.gmail.com>
References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> <a36d16c80811070608t520ae621yeec8276edb017eed@mail.gmail.com> <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org> <a36d16c80811070657o13dc077fqc094f5eedb760397@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811071636j27778025n697e4fffe031f433@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 08:57, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
>> Anyway, reassignment of extant cmavo is not likely to happen, for reasons of forwards-compatibility.
>
> If nobody uses a cmavo and we deprecate it, is it still "extant"?

"forwards compatibility" being "I want to read this lojban text from
20 years ago and they're using this cmavo in a very strange way that I
don't know...

Except we're not!

--
Daniel Brockman
daniel@brockman.se

References:
- [lojban] la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Daniel Brockman" <daniel@brockman.se>
- [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
  - From: "Chris Capel" <pdf23ds@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: le gusta co minde mutce
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread