[lojban] Re: more grammar discussion

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

There's something odd about this rule:

selbri-4 <- selbri-4 joik-jek selbri-5 / selbri-4 joik tag? KE free*
selbri-3 KEhE? free*
              / selbri-5

It's the only rule (ok, together with the "operator" rule which
presents the same oddness) where joik is not allowed to alternate with
jek or with ek. Why is that?

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.