[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: [jbovlaste] malranxi
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jbovlaste] malranxi
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:40:13 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1259937613; bh=QjAC56WU3Mhyyk5J4IeeiP3uMyPOgml7dXtPUxhfYy4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jAlDURIXg0xYa/HYyKYwyek6Aw3HQTJPFOYSf1xT6VcTpNXpBYq+sOOYgAXbuIRaatgp3L5oUUtZW5EY+hcJXw+dHDUpKkXcgliN7ruuwXn6STTAhC8AiTNOblHr9aNzmtp0Wye0URclJkJjuscA1dggV30Nl3V8+jPaU+kZ6tk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yIm/4ZzYbVSE6OF7xbW5h4cQbxmMarzPI0Ibei+oJ7NZDcy/fwpPK73u73fbwSYA8AZWFG7Ob3hq8EBF8+eWGpFmjZV/syFQa6FltJz+ldeAEjKRq82fVR7v2NogR0W5RXP6y2+Al82pHjP8499nT9ceggG0NtUk0Clk3yta0j0=;
- In-reply-to: <925d17560912021520q72a3b6c5mba2622589e233049@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <348584.67527.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <a36d16c80912021115s648764d6ie6d2cd8e5743b96d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912021520q72a3b6c5mba2622589e233049@mail.gmail.com>
> so I suggest "raxsku"
> "x1 says x2 to x3 via medium x4, which is ironic/contrary to
> expectation (that x1 would say what they really mean, the usual
> expectation when someone says something)
>
> I'm not sure what the x3 aspect of ranxi would be in this case.
>
Is this how you would write it?
{c1 cusku c2 c3 c4 .ijebo lonu go'i cu ranxi lonu so'eda tersmu le go'e}
{c1 raxsku c2 c3 c4}
totus