On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 08:26:41PM +0100, Michael Everson wrote:Actually, that's *exactly* what it represents.
> On 28 Mar 2010, at 16:22, And Rosta wrote:
>
> > IMO /./ is a phoneme whose primary allophone is [?]. That does
> > not imply owt about how it shd be rendered graphologically or
> > typographically, tho.
>
> Jonathan wrote {la.parIs.} but it would seem to me to be unlikely
> that this represents [laʔpaˈrisʔ] with a glottal stop before the
> [p] and after the [s].
Having learned a little bit about what our typograhpic conventions
actually *mean* might result in less hostility.
-Robin
--
They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.