Re: [lojban] la .alis.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com> wrote:

On 29 Mar 2010, at 15:16, Jonathan Jones wrote:

> I believe this practice would be enough to distinguish most cases of {lu...li'u} without the need for any marks.

It would not work in narrative with nested quotation marks where you wish to retain paragraphing.

Granted, it doesn't work with nested quotations.

 

I certainly do not want to turn Alice in to the King James Bible where every verse begins a new paragraph.

Aye. That would be an excessive use of whitespace.

 

Michael

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.