[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] la .alis.
On 30 Mar 2010, at 00:51, A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
> remod, are you seriously suggesting that a competing orthography is the answer to BPFK stagnation?
Competing?
> The BPFK (surely by now a mythical creature) is unable to make any decisions on important issues (now years old) like xorlo, dotside, completing cmavo definitions, correcting the errors in CLL etc. How exactly will a change in the orthography change things?
I'm not proposing to change Lojban's standard orthography. I'm proposing to set one very special book in a particular way, in a variation of Lojban's standard orthography.
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.