Re: [lojban] la .alis.

[Michael Everson <michael.everson@gmail.com>]

On 30 Mar 2010, at 21:54, someone who wishes to remain anonymous responded to me off-list; reposted with that person's approval:

>> I hear a lot of different opinions. Some like the experiment, some loathe it. 
> 
> As a newbie, I like the experiment.  I bet the "normal" look will do wonders for lojban popularity.  Right now, lojban looks like a specialized language for some bizarre, obscure purpose such as defining ontologies for Prolog or Lisp expert systems.  And who besides purists could use it in that form?  But after your style is finalized, lojban should finally be recognizable as a real tongue, useful for ordinary human-to-human interaction.  Besides, beautiful typography never hurts book sales.

I hope that there is a balance that can be struck. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.