Re: [lojban] Explicit non-restriction

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here's what I meant by "restricted to being each thing":
>
> In {ro da zo'u ma poi me da cu broda}, {ma} is being restricted
> a number of times simultaneously --- namely, once for each
> referent of {da}.  Maybe mixing a question and a quantification
> like this is a little weird, but I would assume that an answer
> would have to satisfy every referent of {da} to be correct.

Right, and the only way that something can be each and every thing is
in a universe with only that one thing.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.