Re: [lojban] What gets into 'lo broda'

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is how I would define "PA mei":
>>
>> First we define "pamei", "x1 is one":
>>
>>  ko'a pamei .ijo ro'oi da poi ke'a me ko'a zo'u da du ko'a
>>  "A is one iff for any X among A: X = A"
>
> Why do you need {ro'oi} there?  Why not {ro}?
>
> (Sorry if that's a stupid question.  I'm not familiar with
> these plural quantifiers.)

Either "ro" or "ro'oi" work for this case.

(There is a more sensible way to define "(n)mei" though, and it is to
start by defining "su'o(n)mei" first.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.