On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Brockman
<
daniel@gointeractive.se> wrote:
>>> Yeah, they're probably equivalent, but I particularly like the {na}
>>> interpretation because {UI sai cu'i} = {sei na mutce lo ka broda}
>>> ends up meaning something useful. If we take {cu'i} for {nutli}, then
>>> we get {sei nutli lo ka mutce lo ka broda}, which seems useless.
>>
>> I think I would tend to read that as ((UI sai) cu'i) rather than as
>> (UI (sai cu'i)).
>
> What do you mean, what difference would that make?
Nevermind, "na" and "nutli" both give ((UI sai) cu'i), it's "na'e"