Re: [lojban] Named multiples

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

>  However, prior texts which did
>  not separate {cmevla} from following {selbri} (e.g., "{la .ktulxus. senva
>  denpa}") would either take on a completely different meaning or become invalid.

Oh, that's a good point.  So would you just have to use {ku}/{cu} for that?  And I wonder what would happen to a parser that ran into {la djan cusku zo coi}.  Would it try to suck {cusku} in to the cmevla... where would a parser try to put the elided {ku} in that bridi under the proposed change?  Or would it be a syntax error?

2010/5/18 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> So effectively {mi djan} would be {mi me la djan}.

Or to take a more famous line: "mi tarzan .i do djein".

> And my mistake, I forgot that si,sa,su each had their own selma'o.  So you
> have no qualms about si and su then?

They don't have the problems that "sa" has, no.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.