Re: [lojban] beyond good and evil

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

{jo'e} seems weird here.  are {vrude} and {palci} sets to be union-ed?  And what's wrong with jo'u-ing them together and then lujvo-izing them so that they are the property being virtuous and the property of being evil?

I just tried putting it into jboski and it says that the second lo is misplaced.  I thought {joi} and friends worked like {.e} does, not like {je} does.  Does {joi} make a tanru of some sort?

Clearly I need to re-read the connectives chapter of le xunre cukta

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Oleksii Melnyk <lamelnyk@gmail.com> wrote:

2010/7/7 Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>

In the end I think I like {bancu lo kamvrude jo'u lo kampalci} best.

I think here can be only 1 NU: «bancu lo NU vrude jo'e palci».

--
mu'o mi'e lex

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.