Re: [lojban] beyond good and evil

[Oleksii Melnyk <lamelnyk@gmail.com>]

2010/7/8 Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>

What's wrong with {bancu lo kamvrude jo'u lo kampalci}?

I just feel, that the book with "jo'u" is about the distinction between 2 separate entities, while with "jo'e" is about "existence" of (the set of) both.
In the context of "...no universal morality, that distinguishes...", with "jo'u"  we still can have the "...universal morality that joins/mixes...", 
while with "jo'e" we are denying both. 

So with "lo" -- are we speaking about 2 separate entities, or the whole abstraction of "(.*)ness"?

Alas, I can't say for Nietzsche. I think, here can be 4 significantly different  books with  "jo'u lo", "jo'e lo", "jo'u" and "jo'e" between the "vrude" and "palci".

-- 
mu'o mi'e lex

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.