On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Remo Dentato
<rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
7. darxi le my. cidni should be darxi le be my. cidni or darxi le
> cidni be my. cos it's actually his knee.
I'm not sure why be is needed here. Wouldn't be ok to say "darxi le
my. tupcidni" (to indicate the knee, not just an articulation) ?
He's suggesting that you specify that the joint being checked belongs to Modi. Specifying that the joint being checked is a knee is different.
I say that context is enough in this case, as to me it should be obvious that the joint being checked is Modi's, but his point is valid.
--