[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: "ge ... gi ..." question

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Personally I disagree with xorxes' crusade against connectives and
> termsets.

But I have nothing against connectives.

> I think, if a bit redundant, it avoids the "Red men and
> women" problem that English so often faces, and it's just one more
> thing to push us away from English (and almost anything that'll do
> that is okay in my book).

How is that related to termsets?

> ga/ge/gi/go/gu is bridi-only.

No, they can also connect sumti and bridi-tails.

> Just like je is jufra or tanru internal only.

And tags, and also silly things like NUs, MEX operators, and even termsets!

> Just like .e is sumti only.

Yes.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.