Re: [lojban] Parsers ("ge ... gi ..." question)

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski
wrote:
> Dnia środa, 15 września 2010 o 00:54:19 Jonathan Jones napisał(a):
> >  Okay, what is the best working parser we have right now?
> 
> I'm also interested in this. Anybody knows?

Define "best".

The official parser is, well, most official;
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Official+Parser

camxes is, in many people's eyes, the best encoding of actual Lojban
as it is used/spoken (the "ku joi" problem, for example, is largely
considered a wart, not a true part of the language).
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=camxes

jbofihe does glossing, but has a number of significant bugs in how
it handles the language  http://www.rc0.org.uk/jbofihe/

There are no other parsers I'm aware of.  LogGloss is just a wrapper
on camxes as far as I know, but it may be using the PEG directly; I
don't know, I've never looked at or used it.  Someone should ask
Chris to fix his server, or come find me and we can talk about
hosting.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.